U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit Civil Rights Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Gorbatov, et al v. Gaeta, et al
as 11-1817
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GENNADIY N. GORBATOV and VALENTINA P. GORBATOV, Guardian of Gennadiy N. Gorbatov
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES GAETA, Executive Director, Lynn Housing Authority & Neighborhood Development and LYNN HOUSING AUTHORITY AND NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT
Shuper v. Federal Management Co., Inc., et al
as 10-2352
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALLA IOSIFOVNA SHUPER
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL MANAGEMENT CO., INC., CODMAN-PORTLAND ASSOCIATES, PETER LEWIS and others
Defendant:
DANFORTH HEIGHTS
Haddad v. DeCristofaro, et al
as 10-2128
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT M. HADDAD
Defendant - Appellee:
DOUGLAS R. LOVENBERG, JENIFER DECRISTOFARO and LOVENBERG AND ASSOCIATES
Gomez v. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, et al
as 10-1722
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUIS GOMEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING, CARMEN E. ALICEA, LISANDRA CADIZ-LEBRON and others
Weisenburger, et al v. LaCasa Development Corporation, et al
as 09-2519
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID WEISENBURGER
Plaintiff:
BECKY LUSIGNAN
Defendant - Appellee:
LACASA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a/k/a Women's Development Corporation and HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES CORPORATION
Dickey v. Inspectional Services Departme
as 09-2280
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES DICKEY
Defendant - Appellee:
INSPECTIONAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF BOSTON
Lusignan v. La Casa Development Corporatio, et al
as 09-1798
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BECKY LUSIGNAN
Defendant - Appellee:
LA CASA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, and their management company, a/k/a Womens Development Corporation and HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES CORPORATION
Konopko v. Westfield Housing Authority
as 09-1466
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EUGENE E. KONOPKO
Plaintiff:
REGINA KONOPKO
Defendant - Appellee:
WESTFIELD HOUSING AUTHORITY
Aponte-Rosario, et al v. Jackson, et al
as 09-1362
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARCADIO APONTE-ROSARIO, as Resident of Las Gladiolas Public Housing Project, MIRTA COLON-PELLICIER, as Resident of Las Gladiolas Public Housing Project and IRIS MARGARITA APONTE-MARRERO, as Resident of Las Gladiolas Public Housing Project
Plaintiff:
ROSSANA DE-LEON-RIVERA, as Resident of Las Gladiolas Public Housing Project and LUZ ELENA RAMOS-AYALA, as Resident of Las Gladiolas Public Housing Project
Defendant - Appellee:
ALPHONSO JACKSON, Secretary of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, OLGA SAEZ, Housing Director of the Office for the Puerto Rico/Virgin Islands of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development and MICHAEL COLON, Director, Field Office
Defendant:
SHAUN DONOVAN, Secretary of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, ANIBAL ACEVEDO VILA, Governor of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, CARLOS LABOY, Director of the Puerto Rico Public Housing Administration and others
:
Aponte-Rosario, et al v. Acevedo Vila, et al
as 09-1200
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARCADIO APONTE-ROSARIO, as Resident of Las Gladiolas Public Housing Project, MIRTA COLON-PELLICIER, as Resident of Las Gladiolas Public Housing Project and IRIS MARGARITA APONTE-MARRERO, as Resident of Las Gladiolas Public Housing Project
Plaintiff:
ROSSANA DE-LEON-RIVERA, as Resident of Las Gladiolas Public Housing Project and LUZ ELENA RAMOS-AYALA, as Resident of Las Gladiolas Public Housing Project
Defendant - Appellee:
ANIBAL ACEVEDO VILA, Governor of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, JORGE RIVERA, Secretary of the Department of Housing of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and CARLOS LABOY, Director of the Puerto Rico Public Housing Administration
Defendant:
ALPHONSO JACKSON, Secretary of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, MICHAEL COLON, Director, Field Office, OLGA SAEZ, Housing Director of the Office for the Puerto Rico/Virgin Islands of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development and others
:
and
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
