U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit Civil Rights Cases

Other Civil Rights Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 91 - 100 of 2,586
Gardner v. Placeholder
as 23-4155
Plaintiff: EDSON G. GARDNER
Kahler v. Wal-Mart Stores
as 23-1402
Plaintiff: MARY LEE KAHLER
Defendant: WAL-MART STORES, INC., AKA Walmart, Inc.
Erich, et al v. Smith
as 23-3267
Plaintiff: MARK ERICH and SHAWNA MALONEY
Defendant: ERIK SMITH, in his official capacity as the Superintendent of the Kansas Highway Patrol
Shaw, et al v. Smith
as 23-3264
Plaintiff / Appellee: BLAINE FRANKLIN SHAW, individually and on behalf of a class, SAMUEL JAMES SHAW, individually and on behalf of a class, JOSHUA BOSIRE, individually and on behalf of a class and others
Defendant / Appellant: ERIK SMITH, in his official capacity as the Superintendent of the Kansas Highway Patrol
Defendant: DOUG SCHULTE, Master Trooper, in his individual capacity and BRANDON MCMILLAN, Technical Trooper, in his individual capacity
Springer v. Grisham, et al
as 23-2194
Plaintiff / Appellant: JAMES SPRINGER
Defendant / Appellee: MICHELLE LUJAN GRISHAM, PATRICK ALLEN, NEW MEXICO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH and others
Love, et al v. Grashorn, et al
as 23-1397
Plaintiff / Appellee: WENDY LOVE and JAY HAMM
Defendant / Appellant: OFFICER MATHEW GRASHORN
Defendant: SEARGENT PHILIP METZLER and CITY OF LOVELAND
Villecco v. Barela, et al
as 23-1385
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHAEL VILLECCO
Defendant / Appellee: JOSEPH M. BARELA and PHILIP E. SPESSHARDT
The People of the State of Colorado v. Bailey
as 23-1388
Plaintiff / Appellee: THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Defendant / Appellant: DARRELL LAMONT BAILEY
Villecco v. Spesshardt, et al
as 23-1382
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHAEL VILLECCO
Defendant / Appellee: PHILIP E. SPESSHARDT, JOSEPH M. BARELA, CHER R. HAAVIND and others
Villecco v. Spesshardt
as 23-1383
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHAEL VILLECCO
Defendant / Appellee: PHILIP E. SPESSHARDT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?