U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 107
Hooks v. Workman
as 10-6076
Petitioner - Appellant:
VICTOR WAYNE HOOKS
Respondent - Appellee:
RANDALL G. WORKMAN, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Black v. Workman
as 10-6062
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHNNY DALE BLACK
Respondent - Appellee:
RANDALL G. WORKMAN, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Selsor v. Workman, et al
as 09-5180
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL BASCOM SELSOR
Respondent - Appellee:
RANDALL G. WORKMAN, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary and DREW EDMONDSON, Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Stemple v. Workman
as 09-5097
Petitioner - Appellant:
TIMOTHY SHAUN STEMPLE
Respondent - Appellee:
RANDALL G. WORKMAN, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Alverson v. Workman
as 09-5000
Petitioner - Appellant:
BILLY D. ALVERSON
Respondent - Appellee:
RANDALL G. WORKMAN, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Richie v. Workman
as 08-5095
Petitioner - Appellee:
LONNIE WRIGHT RICHIE
Respondent - Appellant:
MARTY SIRMONS, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Respondent - Appellee:
RANDALL G. WORKMAN, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Richie v. Workman
as 08-5091
Petitioner - Appellant:
LONNIE WRIGHT RICHIE
Respondent - Appellee:
MARTY SIRMONS, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary and RANDALL G. WORKMAN, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Phillips v. Workman
as 08-7043
Petitioner - Appellant:
ERNEST EUGENE PHILLIPS, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
MARTY SIRMONS, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary and RANDALL G. WORKMAN, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Duty v. Workman
as 07-7073
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN DAVID DUTY
Respondent - Appellee:
MARTY SIRMONS, Warden, Oklahoma State Pententiary and RANDALL G. WORKMAN, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Young v. Workman
as 07-5130
Petitioner - Appellant:
JULIUS RECARDO YOUNG
Respondent - Appellee:
MARTY SIRMONS, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary and RANDALL G. WORKMAN, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.