U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 625
Tamiko N. Peele v. The United States Department of Justice through it, et al
as 22-13173
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TAMIKO N. PEELE, And Tamiko N. Peele, Individually On Behalf Of Themselves
Defendant / Appellee:
THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE THROUGH ITS UNITED STATES TRUSTEE PROGRAM, REGION 21 AND IT'S OFFICIALS THE CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE, ERIK P. KIMBALL and others
Not Classified By Court:
ROBERT L. WALKER
The Estate of Samuel I. Roig, et al v. United Parcel Service, Inc., et al
as 22-13043
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THE ESTATE OF SAMUEL I. ROIG, KYLE ROIG, an individual, SAM ROIG, an individual and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., a business entity, THOMAS O'MALLEY, an individual and ROMAINE SEGUIN, an individual
Catherine Taylor v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc.
as 22-12870
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CATHERINE TAYLOR
Defendant / Appellee:
MURPHY OIL USA, INC.
Carlton Hooker, Jr. v. USA
as 22-12820
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARLTON EUGENE HOOKER, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Michael Alhofen, et al v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 22-12068
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL ALHOFEN and MYSHEL ALHOFEN
Defendant / Appellee:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Cristina Denis v. Target Corporation
as 22-11890
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CRISTINA DENIS
Defendant / Appellee:
TARGET CORPORATION
Brian Dodd v. Mary Ford
as 22-11673
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN DODD
Defendant / Appellee:
MARY ANNE FORD
Rosana Nassar v. Eduardo Nassar
as 22-11664
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROSANA BOULHOSA NASSAR
Defendant / Appellee:
EDUARDO BOULHOSA NASSAR
Cheryl Druker v. Walmart, Inc.
as 22-11646
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHERYL DRUKER
Defendant / Appellee:
WALMART, INC.
Michael Hill v. Michael Barnhart, et al
as 22-11540
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL WAYNE HILL
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL ANDREW BARNHART and MEAGAN RENEE KERNS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
