U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit Civil Rights Cases

Cases filed

Cases 1 - 10 of 3,274
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-11890
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-11843
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Randall Rolle v. John Maceluch, et al
as 15-11874
Plaintiff - Appellant: RANDALL LAMONT ROLLE
Defendant - Appellee: JOHN MACELUCH, KATHLEEN KIRWIN, JAMES HANKINSON
Sirica Bumpus v. Harrell Watts, et al
as 15-11846
Plaintiff - Appellant: SIRICA BUMPUS
Defendant - Appellee: HARRELL WATTS, administrator for national inmate appeals, G. DUNCAN, a unit manager, WARDEN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-11826
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Piero Bugoni v. Rick Scott
as 15-11815
Plaintiff - Appellant: PIERO A. BUGONI
Defendant - Appellee: RICK SCOTT, Governor, in his official and individual capacities
Mario Jimenez v. Karen Wizel, et al
as 15-11861
Plaintiff - Appellant: MARIO JIMENEZ
Defendant - Appellee: KAREN WIZEL, Mother; and in re: the support and welfare of Mario Simon Jimenez-Wizel and Karen Nicole Jimenez-Wizel, DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES (DCF), THEREZA HERNENDEZ and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-11850
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
John Pullins v. Dean Hagins, et al
as 15-11789
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOHN F. PULLINS
Defendant - Appellee: DEAN W. HAGINS, an individual, R&J TOWING AND RECOVERY, INC., a Florida Corporatiion, JOHN R. GAINEY, an individually and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-11788
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
1 2 3 4 5 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.