U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit Civil Rights Cases

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 4,738
Jose Munoz v. USA
as 17-15261
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOSE SALVADOR MUNOZ
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Dammuon Epps, et al v. Cherry Jones, et al
as 17-15250
Plaintiff - Appellant: DAMMUON EPPS, and on behalf of their minor children K.E., D.E., K.E. D.E., K.E., L.E., K.E., TANYA GRIFFIN, and on behalf of their minor children K.E., D.E., K.E., D.E., K.E., L.E., K.E.
Defendant - Appellee: CHERRY JONES, STEPHANIE GILLISPIE, JUDY JOSEN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-15081
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-15092
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Sandra Green, et al v. City of Lawrenceville, Georgia, et al
as 17-15015
Plaintiff - Appellant: SANDRA R. GREEN, JEROME R. GREEN
Defendant - Appellee: CITY OF LAWRENCEVILLE, GEORGIA, JOHN W. ANDERSON, in his individual capacity
Oliver Giles v. J. Manser
as 17-15018
Plaintiff - Appellant: OLIVER GILES
Defendant - Appellee: J. B. MANSER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-15026
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Ronald Emrit v. Henderson Behavioral Health
as 17-15051
Plaintiff - Appellant: RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant - Appellee: HENDERSON BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
Jack Stone, et al v. Keisei Electric Railway Co., et al
as 17-15041
Plaintiff - Appellant: JACK STONE, MIYUKI SUZUKI, MS
Defendant - Appellee: KEISEI ELECTRIC RAILWAY COMPANY, CHIBA CITY, CHIBA PREFECTURAL POLICE HEADQUARTERS and others
Barbara Riley v. Daniel Donatelli, et al
as 17-14986
Plaintiff - Appellant: BARBARA J. RILEY
Defendant - Appellee: DANIEL D. DONATELLI, CURTIS V. TRINKO, PATRICIA A. RIVERS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?