U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit Civil Rights Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 6,369
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-10969
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Derrel Thomas v. Dave Kerner, et al
as 24-10961
Plaintiff:
DERREL LEONARD THOMAS
Defendant:
DAVE KERNER, R. BERLYNE and ALEC D. RITTER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-10984
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-10981
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-10985
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Josiah Colon, et al v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosiv, et al
as 24-10897
Plaintiff:
JOSIAH COLON, BRANDON KLING, ERIC MELE and others
Defendant:
BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS, AND EXPLOSIVES, DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS, AND EXPLOSIVES, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Tiffany Wingo, et al v. Branson Harris, et al
as 24-10933
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY WINGO, KIEARA WINGO, ERIKA WINGO and others
Defendant:
BRANSON HARRIS, CHARLES GORDON, PAUL WILKERSON and others
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-10930
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
New South Media Group, LLC, et al v. Rainbow City, Alabama, City Of
as 24-10895
Plaintiff:
NEW SOUTH MEDIA GROUP, LLC, DEVERICK WILLIAMS, WILLIAM D. WILSON and others
Defendant:
RAINBOW CITY, ALABAMA, CITY OF
Richard Warner, et al v. City of Marathon, et al
as 24-10901
Plaintiff:
RICHARD E. WARNER, as Co-Personal Representatives of the Estate of Joseph Ardolino II, JOHN W. PARENTE, as Co-Personal Representatives of the Estate of Joseph Ardolino II and JOSEPH E. ARDOLINO, individually
Defendant:
CITY OF MARATHON, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, MICHAEL CINQUE, individually and as a City of Marathon Official, RALPH LUCIGNANO, individually and as a City of Marathon Official and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
