U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 127
Misty Simms v. US
as 15-2161
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MISTY SIMMS, next friend of and C. J., an infant
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
RICHARD BOOTH, M.D., VALLEY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Hieda Keeler v. Lawrence Chang
as 15-2070
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HIEDA A. KEELER
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. LAWRENCE CHANG, PARISER DERMATOLOGY, DR. DENNIS CRUFF and others
Shomari Daley v. Cornerstone Montgomery
as 15-1948
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHOMARI SALIM DALEY
Defendant / Appellee:
CORNERSTONE MONTGOMERY and WILLIAM CARLOS PARLER, JR.
Shomari Daley v. Cornerstone Montgomery
as 15-1948
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHOMARI SALIM DALEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CORNERSTONE MONTGOMERY and WILLIAM CARLOS PARLER, JR.
Donna Allen v. Javid Perwaiz
as 15-1724
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONNA DAVIS-INGRAM ALLEN
Defendant - Appellee:
JAVID A. PERWAIZ, M.D. P.C., MELISSA ANGLERO, DO, KHADIJAH JORDAN, M.D., F.A.C.O.G., F.A.C.S. and others
Phyllis Latka v. David Mile
as 15-1418
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PHYLLIS LATKA
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID MILES and NEW HANOVER REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
Judy Miskell v. Allen Rohrer
as 15-1250
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUDY KAY MISKELL
Defendant - Appellee:
ALLEN ROHRER, M.D.
Neil Caesar v. Walgreens Pharmacy #1252
as 15-1238
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NEIL CAESAR
Plaintiff:
COURTNEY KYLE
Defendant - Appellee:
WALGREENS PHARMACY #1252 and WALGREEN COMPANY, d/b/a Walgreens Pharmacy #1252
John Kimble v. Rajesh Rajpal
as 14-1538
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN B. KIMBLE
Defendant - Appellee:
RAJESH K. RAJPAL, M.D. and RAJESH K. RAJPAL, trading as See Clearly Vision Group, L.L.C.
Linda Dawson v. US
as 14-1515
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LINDA LOU DAWSON, individually and in her capacity as Executor of the Estate of Ronald Wade, Deceased
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
