U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 127
Tracy Wade v. US
as 14-1500
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRACY E. WADE, Administratrix of the Estate of Richard Brian Wade
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Paula Szyjka v. Peter Vandermeer
as 14-1439
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROMAN SZYJKA, Individually and PAULA SZYJKA
Defendant - Appellee:
PETER VANDERMEER, M.D., ADVANCED RADIOLOGY, P.A. and BALTIMORE WASHINGTON MEDICAL CENTER INCORPORATED
Defendant:
MIB PARTNERSHIP, LLP
Vickie Mills v. Veterans Administration
as 14-1421
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VICKIE G. MILLS
Defendant - Appellee:
VETERANS ADMINISTRATION, SALEM NURSING REHAB, RALEIGH COURT REHAB and others
Vickie Mills v. CCL
as 14-1419
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VICKIE G. MILLS
Defendant - Appellee:
CCL, LGH, COM. and others
John Raplee, Jr. v. US
as 14-1217
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN DAVID RAPLEE, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Thomas A. Murray v. Accomack County Health Dept
as 14-1134
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS A. MURRAY
Defendant - Appellee:
ACCOMACK COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT, Director
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Penny Browning v. US
as 14-1063
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PENNY BROWNING
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
John Kimble v. Rajesh Rajpal
as 14-1024
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN B. KIMBLE
Defendant - Appellee:
RAJESH K. RAJPAL, M.D. and RAJESH K. RAJPAL, trading as See Clearly Vision Group, L.L.C.
Faye M. Goodie v. US
as 13-2317
Plaintiff - Appellee:
FAYE M. GOODIE, Individually and as Personal Representative, of the Estate of Maurice L. Johnson, MAURICE SCOTT, TIFFANY JOHNSON and others
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
John Kimble v. Rajesh Rajpal
as 13-2140
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN B. KIMBLE
Defendant - Appellee:
RAJESH K. RAJPAL, M.D. and RAJESH K. RAJPAL, trading as See Clearly Vision Group, L.L.C.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
