U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit Civil Rights Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 73
Tyrone Hurt v. Superior Court
as 15-1592
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRONE HURT
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERIOR COURT
Ronald Green v. Loretta Lynch
as 15-1378
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROY L. PERRY-BEY and RONALD M. GREEN
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U.S. Attorney General, in his individual and official capacity, ANGELA J. MILLER, U.S. Attorney, Voting Section, in her individual and official capacity, T. CHRISTIAN HERREN, Chief U.S. Attorney, in his individual and official capacity and others
Robert Sarvis v. Charles Judd
as 15-1162
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT C. SARVIS
Plaintiff:
LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF VIRGINIA, WILLIAM HAMMER, JEFFREY CARSON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES E. JUDD, in his individual and official capacities as member of the Virginia State Board of Elections, DONALD PALMER, in his individual and official capacities as member of the Virginia State Board of Elections and KIMBERLY T. BOWERS, in her individual and official capacities as member of the Virginia State Board of Elections
Roy Krieger v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 14-2176
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROY WALTER KRIEGER
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, LOUDON COUNTY, DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY SERVICES, WARREN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES and others
Defendant:
LOUDON COUNTY, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES
NC State Conference v. Patrick McCrory
as 14-1856
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES OF THE NAACP, ROSANELL EATON, EMMANUEL BAPTIST CHURCH and others
Plaintiff:
NEW OXLEY HILL BAPTIST CHURCH, BAHEEYAH MADANY, JOHN DOE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICK L. MCCRORY, in his official capacity as Governor of the state of North Carolina, JOSHUA B. HOWARD, in his official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections, RHONDA K. AMOROSO, in her official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections and others
:
, , and others
League of Women Voters of NC v. State of North Carolina
as 14-1859
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF NORTH CAROLINA, A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE, UNIFOUR ONESTOP COLLABORATIVE and others
Intervenor/Plaintiff:
LOUIS M. DUKE, CHARLES M. GRAY, ASGOD BARRANTES and others
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, JOSHUA B. HOWARD, in his official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections, RHONDA K. AMOROSO, in her official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections and others
:
Louis Duke v. State of North Carolina
as 14-1845
Plaintiff:
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF NORTH CAROLINA, A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE, UNIFOUR ONESTOP COLLABORATIVE and others
Intervenor/Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUIS M. DUKE, CHARLES M. GRAY, ASGOD BARRANTES and others
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, JOSHUA B. HOWARD, in his official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections, RHONDA K. AMOROSO, in her official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections and others
Ronald Green v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-1761
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD M. GREEN
Plaintiff:
ROY L. PERRY-BEY
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U.S. Attorney General, in his individual and official capacity, ANGELA J. MILLER, U.S. Attorney, Voting Section, in her individual and official capacity, T. CHRISTIAN HERREN, Chief U.S. Attorney, in his individual and official capacity and others
Calla Wright v. State of North Carolina
as 14-1329
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CALLA WRIGHT, WILLIE J. BETHEL, AMY T. LEE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and WAKE COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS
Al Pisano v. Gary Bartlett
as 13-1368
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AL PISANO, NORTH CAROLINA CONSTITUTION PARTY, NORTH CAROLINA GREEN PARTY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY O. BARTLETT, as Executive Director of the North Carolina Board of Elections, LARRY LEAKE, as Member of the North Carolina Board of Elections, ROBERT CORDLE, as Member of the North Carolina Board of Elections and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
