U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit Civil Rights Cases

Other Civil Rights Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 21 - 30 of 3,704
Searcy v. Shrestha
as 24-10335
Plaintiff: Candace Searcy
Defendant: Bishnu Shrestha and Sanjay Rimal
D. v. Abbott
as 24-40248
Plaintiff: M. D., by next friend Sarah R. Stukenberg, D. I., by next friend Nancy G. Pofahl, Z. H., by next friend Carla B. Morrison and others
Defendant: Greg Abbott, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Texas, Cecile Erwin Young, in her official capacity as Executive Commissioner of the Health and Human Services Commission of the State of Texas and Stephanie Muth, in her official capacity as Commissioner of Texas Department of Family and Protective Services
Kennedy v. Biden
as 24-30252
Plaintiff: Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Childrens Health Defense and Connie Sampognaro
Defendant: Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Karine Jean-Pierre, Vivek H. Murthy and others
Smith v. Gonzalez
as 24-40242
Plaintiff: Derek D. Smith
Defendant: Javier Gonzalez, Officer, Joe Elrod and City of Corpus Christi
Goad v. Lyde
as 24-10333
Plaintiff: Landon Paul Goad and Sarah Lynn Johnson
Defendant: Jeff Lyde, Clay County, Texas and John Does, 1-10
Colson v. City of San Marcos
as 24-50283
Plaintiff: Austin Ray Colson
Defendant: City of San Marcos, Texas, Chief of Police Stan Standridge, Officer Stan Standridge and others
Oduwole v. Lyft
as 24-10325
Plaintiff: Odulaja Samson Oduwole
Defendant: Lyft, Incorporated
Darries v. Cornelius
as 24-20159
Plaintiff: Willie Darries
Defendant: R. P. Cornelius
Demas v. City of McAllen Police
as 24-40238
Plaintiff: Evenson Demas
Defendant: City of McAllen Police Department, Peter Boyko, individually and as agent of City of McAllen Police Department and Comfort Awuku, individually and other officers unknown
Carico v. Bristow
as 24-40239
Plaintiff: Colton Carico
Defendant: Derek Bristow

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?