US District Court for the Central District of California Torts - Injury Cases

Asbestos Personal Injury Product Liability Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 245
Gary Anderson et al v. Johnson and Johnson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv03832
Defendant: Johnson and Johnson Consumer, Inc., Johnson and Johnson
Plaintiff: Gary Anderson, Judy Anderson, Wayne Anderson
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Personal Injury
Scott Kesterson et al v. Johnson and Johnson et al
as 2:2020cv03555
Defendant: CVS Health Corporation, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., Bayer Healthcare LLC and others
Plaintiff: SCOTT KESTERSON, KATHERINE KESTERSON
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Personal Injury
Deborah Sarver et al v. Arvinmeritor, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv01883
Defendant: Hyster-Yale Group, Inc., Standard Motor Products, Inc., WELCO Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff: Deborah Sarver, Jeremiah Sarver, Sabrina Sarver
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Dennis C. Payne et al v. Abb, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv01713
Defendant: YORK INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION (sued individually and as successor-in-interest to FRICK COMPANY), VIAD CORP (sued individually and as successor-in-interest to GRISCOM RUSSELL COMPANY), AMERICAN COMPRESSOR COMPANY and others
Plaintiff: Susan Payne, Dennis C Payne
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Christopher Clarke et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 2:2020cv00591
Defendant: PENTAIR VALVES & CONTROLS, INC. (sued individually and as successor-in-interest 10 KEYSTONE VALVES & CONTROLS, INC.), Gardner Denver, Inc., J.T. Thorpe & Son, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Christopher Clarke, Clarke Cheryl
Cause Of Action: Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation
George Kruse et al v. Actuant Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv09540
Defendant: OSRAM SYLVANIA, INC. (sued individually and as successor-in-interest to GTE SYLVANIA successor-in-interest to PHILCO-FORD), HARCOSEMCO LLC (sued individually and as successor-by-merger to HARCO LLC f/k/a HARCO LABORATORIES, INCORPORATED), LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION d/b/a LOCKHEED MARTIN AERONAUTICS (sued individually and as successor-by-merger to MARTIN MARIETTA) and others
Plaintiff: George Kruse, Shigeko Kruse
Cause Of Action: Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation
James Laukat et al v. ABB, Inc., et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv09436
Defendant: DCo LLC, f/k/a and individually as successor in interest to Dana Companies LLC, Victor Corporation, Victor Gaskets and Victor Manufacturing and Gasket Company, OReilly Auto Enterprises, LLC f/k/a CSK Auto, Inc. individually and as successor in interest to Grand Auto, Inc. and Kragen Auto Parts, SPX Corporation, individually and as successor in interest to Bear Automotive Service Equipment Company and others
Plaintiff: Misun Laukat, James Laukat
Cause Of Action: Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Patrick W. Dennis et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 2:2019cv09343
Plaintiff: PATRICK W DENNIS, ROSA DENNIS, Patrick W. Dennis
Defendant: AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION (sued individually and as successor-by-merger to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC.), Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, Foster Wheeler LLC and others
Petitioner: VIAD CORP (sued individually and as successor-in-interest to GRISCOM RUSSELL COMPANY)
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Arthur Rosengren v. Curtiss-Wright Corporation et al
as 2:2019cv09064
Defendant: The Boeing Company, United Technologies Corporation, Curtiss-Wright Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Arthur Rosengren
Cause Of Action: Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation
Lynne Bodge v. United Technologies Corporation
as 2:2019cv07411
Plaintiff: Lynne Bodge
Defendant: United Technologies Corporation, Cytec Industries, Inc., Metroplitan Life Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: Notice of Removal

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?