US District Court for the Eastern District of California Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 44,466
(HC) Saintillus v. USA
as 2:2024cv01211
Petitioner:
Chaloner Saintillus
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
(PC) Bonilla v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv01208
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Dicks v. Moseley et al
as 1:2024cv00492
Plaintiff:
Eric Dicks
Defendant:
H. Moseley, S. Gates, Melinda Chan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Harper v. Marquez et al
as 2:2024cv01194
Plaintiff:
Daniel Harper
Defendant:
G. Marquez, D. Baker and David Caraballo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Parker v. Sacramento et al
as 2:2024cv01195
Plaintiff:
Akika Parker
Defendant:
Sacramento, El Dorado Hills, Sacramento Sheriff Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Miles v. Sutter County Sherriff et al
as 2:2024cv01196
Plaintiff:
Georgia Miles
Defendant:
Sutter County Sherriff, Sutter County Jail and Yuba City Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Williams v. Borla
as 2:2024cv01197
Petitioner:
Cameron Williams
Respondent:
Edward Borla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Khouanmany v. Painter
as 2:2024cv01189
Petitioner:
Vilaychith Khonamany
Respondent:
Daniel K. Painter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) McCaa v. FCI-Herlong et al
as 2:2024cv01191
Plaintiff:
Cedriguez McCaa
Defendant:
FCI-Herlong, S. Salmonson, Haggard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Booth v. Pouge, et al.
as 1:2024cv00486
Plaintiff:
Patrick J. Booth
Defendant:
Tyson Pouge, Lopez, Alva and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
