US District Court for the Eastern District of California Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 44,471
(PC) Miles v. Sutter County Sherriff et al
as 2:2024cv01196
Plaintiff:
Georgia Miles
Defendant:
Sutter County Sherriff, Sutter County Jail and Yuba City Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Williams v. Borla
as 2:2024cv01197
Petitioner:
Cameron Williams
Respondent:
Edward Borla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Khouanmany v. Painter
as 2:2024cv01189
Petitioner:
Vilaychith Khonamany
Respondent:
Daniel K. Painter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) McCaa v. FCI-Herlong et al
as 2:2024cv01191
Plaintiff:
Cedriguez McCaa
Defendant:
FCI-Herlong, S. Salmonson, Haggard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Booth v. Pouge, et al.
as 1:2024cv00486
Plaintiff:
Patrick J. Booth
Defendant:
Tyson Pouge, Lopez, Alva and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Rodriguez v. Unknown
as 1:2024cv00487
Plaintiff:
Antonio Rodriguez
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Vanatti v. J. Gates et al
as 1:2024cv00488
Plaintiff:
Lynden Vanatti
Defendant:
J. Gates, O. Pavon, J. Ebaniz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cordova v. Rodriguez, et al.
as 1:2024cv00482
Plaintiff:
Zenaida Cordova
Defendant:
Greg Rodriguez and Michael Pallares
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Salazar-Mendoza v. Warden
as 1:2024cv00479
Petitioner:
Alejandro Salazar-Mendoza
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(PC) Nieto v. Allison et al
as 1:2024cv00478
Plaintiff:
Michael Nieto
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison, Hernandez, Jimenez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
