US District Court for the Northern District of California Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 131 - 140 of 10,128
Blevins v. FCI-Dublin Warden
as 4:2023cv05057
Petitioner:
Shondolyn Rochelle Blevins
Defendant:
FCI-Dublin Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jenkins v. People of the State of California
as 5:2023cv05123
Petitioner:
Alonzo Jenkins
Respondent:
People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shaheed v. People of the State of California
as 3:2023cv04796
Petitioner:
Shaheed B. Karriem and Karriem B. Shaheed
Respondent:
People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Soloman v. Black
as 3:2023cv04799
Petitioner:
Nebiyu Soloman
Respondent:
Eric Vega and Jason Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Stull v. Smith
as 4:2023cv04756
Petitioner:
James Conrad Stull
Respondent:
Oak Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ruiz v. Baugman
as 3:2023cv04777
Plaintiff:
Rogelio May Ruiz
Defendant:
David Baugman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sakhanskiy v. Jusino
as 5:2023cv04751
Petitioner:
Larisa Sakhanskiy
Respondent:
Warden Jusino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Merced v. Covello
as 3:2023cv04763
Petitioner:
Juan Autilano Merced, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Herndon v. San Rafael P. D.
as 3:2023cv04669
Petitioner:
Gerrod Herndon
Respondent:
San Rafael P. D. and Novato P. D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Rivera v. Jusino
as 4:2023cv04635
Petitioner:
Juana G. Rivera
Respondent:
Warden Jusino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.