US District Court for the Northern District of California Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 10,122
Pierce v. Humboldt County Superior Court
as 3:2023cv05586
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Pierce
Respondent:
Humboldt County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Bratcher v. Matteson et al
as 5:2023cv05566
Petitioner:
Hassan Lee Bratcher
Respondent:
Giselle Matteson and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wallace v. Cueva
as 5:2023cv05514
Petitioner:
Clinton D. Wallace
Respondent:
Danial Cueva
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Triplett v. McVay
as 1:2023cv05452
Petitioner:
Thomas Andrew Triplett
Respondent:
Acting Warden Matthew McVay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Valdovinos v. Macomber
as 3:2023cv05351
Petitioner:
Felix Valdovinos
Respondent:
Secretary Jeff Macomber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adanna Ibe VS Unknown
as 5:2023cv05301
Petitioner:
Adanna Ibe
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Calderon v. People of the State of California
as 3:2023cv05298
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Calderon
Respondent:
People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Archuleta v. Covello
as 3:2023cv05222
Petitioner:
David Clair Archuleta
Respondent:
Warden Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Khan v. Broomfield
as 3:2023cv05249
Petitioner:
Mohammed Zarin Khan
Respondent:
Ron Broomfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bonilla
as 4:2023cv05166
Petitioner:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
