US District Court for the Northern District of California Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 10,122
Quarles v. Contra Costa County
as 3:2023cv06635
Petitioner:
Christopher Quarles
Respondent:
Contra Costa County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Calderon v. Covello
as 3:2023cv06560
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Calderon
Respondent:
P Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Caparaz v. People of the State of California
as 5:2023cv06562
Petitioner:
Alvin V. Caparaz
Respondent:
People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Amaral-Montalvo v. High Desert State Prison Warden
as 3:2023cv06525
Petitioner:
Albaro Amaral-Montalvo
Defendant:
High Desert State Prison Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dela Calzada v. Patrick Covello
as 3:2023cv06465
Petitioner:
Jovencio Dela Calzada
Respondent:
Warden Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reich v. Warden of San Quentin State Prison et al
as 5:2023cv06381
Petitioner:
Antonio Joaquin Reich
Respondent:
Warden of San Quentin State Prison, Lt. Bass, Lt. T Bermudez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Williams v. Borla
as 3:2023cv06382
Petitioner:
Antoine Williams
Respondent:
Edward Borla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cleveland v. Martinez
as 3:2023cv06306
Petitioner:
Ivan V. Cleveland
Respondent:
L.A. Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. Warden
as 5:2023cv06274
Petitioner:
Kevin Lewis
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Singh v. Macomber
as 4:2023cv06303
Petitioner:
Raghvendra Singh
Respondent:
Jeff Macomber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
