US District Court for the Northern District of California
Cases 111 - 120 of 153,692
DS HOUSING CCCRR-01, LP v. Exum
as 4:2024cv02552
Plaintiff:
DS HOUSING CCCRR-01, LP
Defendant:
Jessy Exum
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
v. Wormuth et al
as 7:2024cv02558
Defendant:
Christine E. Wormuth and Department of the Army
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Khamis v. Wormuth et al
as 7:2024cv02559
Plaintiff:
Sinaa Khamis
Defendant:
Christine E. Wormuth and Department of the Army
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Porchia et al v. Skims Body, Inc.
as 3:2024cv02562
Plaintiff:
Catherine Porchia and Mathilda Silverstein
Defendant:
Skims Body, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Serabia v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv02556
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc., Facebook, Inc., Instagram, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Faith Serabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
M.A. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv02568
Plaintiff:
M.A.
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
County of Oakland, Michigan v. Meta Platforms Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv02554
Plaintiff:
County of Oakland, Michigan
Defendant:
Meta Platforms Inc., Instagram, LLC, Facebook Payments, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02550
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv02560
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv02563
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
