Southern District of Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 8,813
Shack v. Honorable Presiding Judge
as 3:2017cv00100
Petitioner: James Darnell Shack
Respondent: Honorable Presiding Judge
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramos v. California Correctional Health Care Services et al
as 3:2017cv00111
Plaintiff: Jose Ramos
Defendant: California Correctional Health Care Services, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Terrell v. Armant et al
as 3:2017cv00088
Petitioner: Matthew Terrell
Respondent: C. Armant, Attorney General of the State of California
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wooten v. Kernan et al
as 3:2017cv00094
Petitioner: William Fred Wooten
Respondent: Scott Kernan, Kamala Harris
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Lee et al
as 3:2017cv00095
Plaintiff: Toney Alfonso Johnson
Defendant: Lee, S. Rascon
Cause Of Action: pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00071
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Figures v. Victorville USP Prison et al
as 3:2017cv00082
Plaintiff: Phillip P. Figures
Defendant: Victorville USP Prison, Cox, Valero and others
Cause Of Action: pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas Daniel Bovensiep v. Dean Borders
as 3:2017cv00074
Petitioner: Thomas Daniel Bovensiep
Respondent: Dean Borders
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00073
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Blackman v. Bracamonte et al
as 3:2017cv00059
Plaintiff: Tony Blackman
Defendant: P Bracamonte, R. Olivarra, J. Mendosa and others
Cause Of Action: pr Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?