US District Court for the Northern District of Florida Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 14,081
TEAMER v. DIXON
as 3:2024cv00200
Petitioner:
KERRICK VAN TEAMER
Respondent:
RICKY S DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCCUMSEY v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 3:2024cv00203
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER D MCCUMSEY
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WELLS v. ESCAMBIA COUNTY JAIL et al
as 3:2024cv00199
Plaintiff:
MARSHAUN A WELLS
Defendant:
ESCAMBIA COUNTY JAIL and ESCAMBIA COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. ALACHUA COUNTY JAIL STAFF AND ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
TAVEROUS WILLIAMS
Defendant:
ALACHUA COUNTY JAIL STAFF AND ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
v. MURZIKE et al
as 3:2024cv00197
Defendant:
JAMES T. MURZIKE, D ELLIS, T THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRYANT v. SIMMONS et al
as 3:2024cv00198
Plaintiff:
RONNIE BRYANT
Defendant:
CHIP SIMMONS, MS LESLEY and ESCAMBIA COUNTY JAIL HEALTH SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURZIKE v. QUINN et al
as 3:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant:
R QUINN, W GIELOW, J SANTIAGO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WESLEY v. PAYNE et al
as 5:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
JAMES ALLEN WESLEY, JR
Defendant:
S PAYNE and C WALKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CUMMINGS v. CRUNK et al
as 4:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
HORACE BENJAMIN CUMMINGS
Defendant:
WILLIAM CRUNK, KASEY M PAYNTER, JAMES R RYAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCWILLIAMS v. MURPHY
as 5:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
MAURICE MCWILLIAMS
Defendant:
P MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
