US District Court for the Northern District of Florida Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 6,836
BRYANT v. KIRKLAND et al
as 5:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
BUSTER BRYANT
Defendant:
AARON A KIRKLAND, PATTON and ARMSTRONG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHRISTOPHE v. DOE
as 3:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
ILMART CHRISTOPHE
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOGGS v. DAVIS et al
as 4:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
HARRY LEE BOGGS, JR
Defendant:
DAVIS, BRICE GOOGLE, D WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WASHINGTON v. WATKINS et al
as 3:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
MARLO WASHINGTON
Defendant:
WATKINS, T FRAZURE, J BURCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. QUINN et al
as 3:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
DIONTE JERMAINE DAVIS and CHRISTOPHER HORTEN
Defendant:
R QUINN, C HORTEN, K EMMIT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COLVILLE v. CHESTNUT et al
as 3:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
JACOB MONROE COLVILLE
Defendant:
T CHESTNUT and ESCAMBIA COUNTY COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. MILLER et al
as 4:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
MARIO M THOMAS
Defendant:
JAMES WILLIAM MILLER, SHAWN SWAIN and DAWN A HART
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUTLEDGE v. DEVORE-GUIFARRO et al
as 1:2024cv00059
Defendant:
BRACHER, E DEVORE-GUIFARRO, BODIFORD and others
Plaintiff:
EDDIE VINCENT RUTLEDGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EVANS v. LEBLANC et al
as 4:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
PARIS DEMETRIUS EVANS
Defendant:
BOB LEBLANC, GARY E MOLEK, HEATHER DANIELLE PASTOOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DANIELS v. TAYLOR CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE et al
as 4:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH DARRELL DANIELS
Defendant:
TAYLOR CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE, JULIE JONES, WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
