US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia Civil Rights Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 1,604
CRANE v. CLARK et al
as 5:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
AMY CRANE
Defendant:
SARAH CLARK, BRANDI CUNNINGHAM and ASHLEY SLAUGHTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
v. DOLLAR GENERAL CORPORATION
as 5:2024cv00017
Defendant:
DOLLAR GENERAL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
v. OLIVER
as 5:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY J OLIVER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TYRONE OLIVER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
LOVAS v. HANCOCK
as 1:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
PAMELA LOVAS
Defendant:
SHERIFF BILLY HANCOCK
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0242 Deprivation of rights under color of law
LACLAIR v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
DEREK LACLAIR
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
GRAHAM v. CRISP REGIONAL HOSPITAL
as 1:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
HILDA GRAHAM
Defendant:
CRISP REGIONAL HOSPITAL, PAVEL BOMAR, MARISSA BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
STEWART v. SAMPSON
as 5:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BRYAN STEWART
Defendant:
WARDEN GREGORY SAMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
WALKER et al v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 5:2023cv00515
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER WALKER and ANTONIO WALKER
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES and ANDREA PETTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NARCUSSE v. GENESYS HEALTH ALLIANCE et al
as 5:2023cv00510
Plaintiff:
Marie Narcisse and MARIE M MARCISSE
Defendant:
GENESYS HEALTH ALLIANCE, Peter Wrobel, Shad Stormant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
EDWARDS v. WAYNE STEWART TRUCKING COMPANY et al
as 1:2023cv00221
Plaintiff:
ESEAN EDWARDS
Defendant:
WAYNE STEWART TRUCKING COMPANY, STARNET INSURANCE COMPANY, KEY RISK MANAGEMENT COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
