US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia Civil Rights Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 3,658
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
PASCHAL v. AUGUSTA STATE MEDICAL PRISON
as 4:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
WARREN PASCHAL, JR
Defendant:
AUGUSTA STATE MEDICAL PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION v. RSPS HOLDINGS LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
Defendant:
RSPS HOLDINGS LLC and SRS MILLEDGEVILLE LLC doing business as SHANE'S RIB SHACK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
ROSE-BURRELL v. CITY OF MONROE et al
as 3:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
LALLYMAY ROSE-BURREL
Defendant:
CITY OF MONROE, NICHOLAS SILVERBERG and OFFICER RYAN GEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROWN et al v. HATCHER
as 5:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
DARLENE BROWN and KELVIN BROWN
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT LATRICE HATCHER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
NIX v. CALLAHAN et al
as 1:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
CHIP W NIX
Defendant:
MICHAEL CALLAHAN and JAMES STEINBERG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MACKRELL et al v. BUTLER
as 7:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
HALEY MACKRELL and M T M
Defendant:
ANGELA BUTLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HUMPHREY v. MOODY et al
as 7:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
GREGORY HUMPHREY
Defendant:
JAMES MOODY, ASHLEY KERN and RODNEY FOULKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
