Northern District of Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed


Cases 11 - 20 of 4,298
Menefee v. Kilpatrick
as 1:2018cv01347
Petitioner: Travon Menefee
Respondent: Terence Kilpatrick
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Berry v. Unnamed Respondent
as 1:2018cv01379
Petitioner: Delwin Berry
Respondent: Unnamed Respondent
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hunter v. Harmon
as 1:2018cv01230
Petitioner: Kenneth Ray Hunter
Respondent: Harmon
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Pendleton v. U.S. Attorney General
as 1:2018cv01245
Petitioner: Eugene Lamar Pendleton
Respondent: U.S. Attorney General
WINGSTER v. BLAKELY
as 1:2018cv01231
Petitioner: MARQUIS WINGSTER
Respondent: Don Blakely
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Inman v. State of Georgia
as 1:2018cv01221
Petitioner: Kenneth Inman
Respondent: State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FALCON v. INCH et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv01156
Petitioner: Nick Falcon
Respondent: MARK INCH , THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CHANEY v. TAYLOR
as 1:2018cv01141
Petitioner: QUENTIN CHANEY
Respondent: Cedric Taylor
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burrage v. Gordy et al
as 4:2018cv00092
Petitioner: James David Burrage
Respondent: Christopher Gordy, Attorney General for the State of Georgia, Chattooga County District Attorney
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burrage v. Gordy et al
as 1:2018cv01170
Petitioner: James David Burrage
Respondent: Christopher Gordy, Attorney General for the State of Georgia, Chattooga County District Attorney
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?