US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 5,821
Nunez v. Jenkins
as 1:2024cv00870
Petitioner:
Luis Alfonso Nunez
Respondent:
Warden S. Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lester v. Bennett et al
as 1:2024cv00824
Petitioner:
Henry L. Lester
Defendant:
Lovett Bennett, Jr., Li and Registered Nurse Lee
Respondent:
Judge Lovett Bennett, David Abbott, Renata Newbill-Jallow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Briones v. State of Georgia
as 1:2024cv00790
Petitioner:
Wofford Briones and Briones Wofford
Respondent:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wofford v. State of Georgia
as 4:2024cv00056
Petitioner:
Briones Wofford
Respondent:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Patrick v. Paulding County State Court
as 4:2024cv00048
Petitioner:
Raymond Dushawn Patrick
Respondent:
Paulding County State Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Billings v. Shavers
as 3:2024cv00028
Petitioner:
Eric Isaiah Billings
Respondent:
Warden Brian Shavers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cooper v. Hancock State Prison
as 1:2024cv00692
Petitioner:
Travon Cooper
Respondent:
Hancock State Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parker v. Jones
as 1:2024cv00702
Petitioner:
Otis Parker
Respondent:
Mr. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hollowell v. Tripp
as 1:2024cv00659
Petitioner:
Jo'Von Montell Hollowell
Respondent:
Warden B. Tripp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Tiggs v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00027
Petitioner:
Tavorris Tiggs
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
