US District Court for the District of Idaho
Cases 111 - 120 of 12,237
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Williams v. Young et al
as 1:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Kent Williams
Defendant:
Steve Young, Warden Richardson, SGT. Smyth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quinones v. Davis et al
as 1:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Julian R. Quinones
Defendant:
Kelly D Davis, Jason Davis and Alliance Title Co.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Anaya
as 1:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Davis Davis
Defendant:
C/O Anaya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Downs v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00116
Petitioner:
Michele Downs
Respondent:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ray v. F.B.O.P
as 1:2024cv00115
Petitioner:
Nathan E. Ray
Respondent:
F.B.O.P
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States of America v. Ace Black Ranches, LLP
as 1:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Ace Black Ranches, LLP
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Clean Water Act
Steed et al v. Mentor Corporation, et al.
as 2:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Edsel Steed and Sevita Corporation
Defendant:
Mentor Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Quinones v. Ponting, et al.
as 1:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Julian R. Quinones
Defendant:
Becky Ponting and Hanly Ponting
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stone v. AK Gang member
as 1:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Unknown First Name Stone and Stone
Defendant:
AK, gang member, I.M.S.I. Gang AK and SVC, IMSI Gang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
