US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Contract Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 233
Medix Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. Connected Care et al
as 1:2020cv02899
Defendant:
Sanjay Patil, Connected Care, Excelera and others
Plaintiff:
Medix Staffing Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Chicago Pallet Service II Inc.,vs SP Holdings, Inc.,
as 1:2020cv01027
Plaintiff:
Chicago Pallet Service II, 1875 Greenleaf Avenue, Elk Grove Village, Illinois
Defendant:
SP Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Trustees of the National Elevator v. 1st Priority Elevator Co. et al
as 1:2020cv00885
Defendant:
Mauline Williams and 1st Priority Elevator Co.
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the National Elevator
Shapiro v. IRS et al
as 1:2020cv00791
Defendant:
Target, IRS, Postmates and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Shapiro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Anderson
as 1:2020cv00439
Defendant:
Cheryl Anderson
Plaintiff:
Gary Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ramada Worldwide Inc. v. Fortune Circle LLC et al
as 1:2019cv06780
Defendant:
Fortune Circle LLC and Syed A. Hussain
Plaintiff:
Ramada Worldwide Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McDonalds USA, LLC v. Stantec Architecture, Inc.
as 1:2019cv06717
Plaintiff:
McDonalds USA, LLC
Defendant:
Stantec Architecture, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Mollison v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 1:2019cv05946
Defendant:
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Plaintiff:
Darryl C Mollison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Norfolk Southern Railway Company v. Piedmont Railway, LLC
as 1:2019cv04144
Defendant:
Piedmont Railway, LLC
Plaintiff:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Perkins Manufacturing Company v. Haul-All Equipment, Ltd.
as 1:2019cv03769
Plaintiff:
Perkins Manufacturing Company
Defendant:
Haul-All Equipment, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
