US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana Civil Rights Cases

Other Civil Rights Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 11 - 20 of 3,022
Hovermale v. Norfolk Southern Corporation
as 3:2024cv00326
Plaintiff: Douglas Hovermale
Defendant: Norfolk Southern Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Benavidez v. Lippert Components, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00322
Plaintiff: CARLOS BENAVIDEZ
Defendant: LIPPERT COMPONENTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Caraballo v. Forgey et al
as 2:2024cv00141
Plaintiff: Frank Caraballo
Defendant: William Forgey, M.D. and Correctional Health Indiana, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Wabash County Sheriff et al
as 3:2024cv00309
Plaintiff: Chad Jackson
Defendant: Wabash County Sheriff, Brooke Murphy, Ms. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Bundy v. Bojovic
as 2:2024cv00135
Plaintiff: Adrienne Bundy
Defendant: Tamara Bojovic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bundy v. Bojovic
as 2:2024cv00136
Plaintiff: Adrienne Bundy
Defendant: Tamara Bojovic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taebel v. Indiana State of et al
as 2:2024cv00127
Plaintiff: Mitch Taebel
Defendant: Indiana State of, Eric Holcomb and Rokita
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Upshaw v. Custer et al
as 1:2024cv00146
Plaintiff: Radiance Marie Upshaw
Defendant: Jason Custer, John Bohdan and Lawrence Shine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taebel v. Link
as 2:2024cv00124
Plaintiff: Mitch Taebel
Defendant: John A. Link
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Owens v. South Bend Community School Corporation
as 3:2024cv00293
Plaintiff: Lester Loviad Owens and Lester L Owens
Defendant: South Bend Community School Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?