US District Court for the District of Massachusetts Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 2,080
Leo v. Divris
as 4:2024cv40021
Petitioner:
Anthony M Leo
Respondent:
Matthew Divris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vasbinder v. Evangelidis et al
as 4:2024cv40017
Plaintiff:
William J. Vasbinder
Defendant:
Lewis Evangelidis, David Tuttle, Christopher Brothers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Latham v. Hurley et al
as 1:2024cv10130
Plaintiff:
Lincoln Latham
Defendant:
Tina Hurley, Charlene Bonner, Tonomey Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Piard v. Murphy
as 4:2024cv40005
Plaintiff:
Joseph Piard
Defendant:
Carolyn Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barker v. Divris et al
as 1:2024cv10089
Plaintiff:
Timothy Barker
Defendant:
Matthew Divris, Anthony Findley and Joe Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Piard v. Stanley
as 4:2024cv40004
Plaintiff:
Joseph Piard
Defendant:
Kelly Stanley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Piard v. Hakala et al
as 4:2023cv40180
Plaintiff:
Joseph Piard
Defendant:
Officer Hakala and Officer Bariamis
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy/Deprivation Civil Rights
Pollock v. Berkshire County Jail and House of Correction et al
as 3:2023cv30131
Plaintiff:
Avery Jacob Pollock
Defendant:
Berkshire County Jail and House of Correction and Goodwordnews.com
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. State of Massachusetts et al
as 3:2023cv30129
Plaintiff:
Marquise Jackson
Defendant:
State of Massachusetts, Dioces of Springfield Church, C&S Wholesale Wharehouse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mahoney et al v. Bowers et al
as 4:2023cv40167
Plaintiff:
Brian E. Mahoney and George Curran
Defendant:
Bowers, Patricia Ruze, Dr. Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
