US District Court for the District of Maryland Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 8,806
SAKHI et al v. Schofer et al
as 1:2024cv01376
Plaintiff:
SARAH OBIDULAH SAKHI and HAMED AREFI
Defendant:
DEPUTY CHIEF Andrew Schofer, SECRETARY ANTONY J BLINKEN, ASST. SECRETARY RENA BITTER and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act - Right of Review
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01381
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Mogan v. Altimmune, Inc. et al
as 8:2024cv01315
Plaintiff:
Joseph Mogan
Defendant:
Altimmune, Inc., Vipin K. Garg, Richard I. Eisenstadt and others
Koh v. Amazon.com, Inc.
as 8:2023cv01796
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Deceptive Trade Practices
Johnson v. Oranye et al
as 1:2023cv01824
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Sodexo, Inc. et al v. Cargill, Inc. et al
as 8:2024cv01256
Plaintiff:
Sodexo, Inc. and Sodexo Operations, LLC
Defendant:
Cargill, Inc., Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation, National Beef Packing Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01254
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Nsiah v. United States Customs and Border Protection
as 1:2024cv01243
Plaintiff:
Nana Opoku Nsiah
Defendant:
United States Customs and Border Protection
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
