US District Court for the District of Maryland Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 8,790
Griffin v. MTC
as 1:2024cv01344
Plaintiff:
Daniel Griffin
Defendant:
MTC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Schneider v. Scruggs et al
as 1:2024cv01324
Plaintiff:
Elliott R. Schneider
Defendant:
Carolyn J. Scruggs, J. Phillip Morgan, William Bohrer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Blanchard v. Warden for MCTC et al
as 1:2024cv01325
Plaintiff:
Ray Blanchard
Defendant:
Warden for MCTC and Correctional Officer Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Lewis et al
as 1:2024cv01316
Plaintiff:
Jerrod Johnson
Defendant:
Sgt. Lewis and CO II Lorke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Newcomb v. Warden of Kent Co. Det. Center et al
as 1:2024cv01298
Plaintiff:
Dyron S. Newcomb
Defendant:
Warden of Kent Co. Det. Center, John Doe I, John Doe II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Watts v. Thompson et al
as 1:2024cv01300
Plaintiff:
Christopher Maurice Watts
Defendant:
Thompson and PrimeCare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Giangrand
as 1:2024cv01235
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Wilson
Defendant:
Robert Giangrand
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. Sgt. Upole et al
as 1:2024cv01221
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Glenn Evans
Defendant:
Sgt. Upole, Ofc. Kock, Sgt. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
El-Bey v. Logsdon et al
as 1:2024cv01169
Plaintiff:
Bro Stephen Michael El-Bey
Defendant:
William Logsdon, F. Farinloye, NDZE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinton v. Warden
as 1:2024cv01212
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Hinton
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
