US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 13,945
Wilson v. Arrowood et al
as 2:2024cv11151
Plaintiff:
Michael Wilson
Defendant:
Paul Arrowood and Logan Barber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bush v. Oakland, County of et al
as 2:2024cv11143
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bush
Defendant:
Oakland, County of and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv11142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Castell v. Saginaw, City of et al
as 1:2024cv11135
Plaintiff:
Shanelle Castell
Defendant:
Saginaw, City of, Megan Nelson, Richard Jacklin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Carlock v. City of Harper Woods et al
as 2:2024cv11122
Plaintiff:
James Carlock
Defendant:
City of Harper Woods, Glen Heaney, Matthew Closurdo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baugh v. Miller et al
as 2:2024cv11126
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Baugh
Defendant:
Joann Miller, The City of Detroit and Wayne County Prosecutors Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Pogue v. Oakland University et al
as 2:2024cv11134
Plaintiff:
Eric Pogue
Defendant:
Oakland University and Ashley Stone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Miles v. Wayne County Treasurer et al
as 2:2024cv11125
Plaintiff:
Charles Miles
Defendant:
Wayne County Treasurer and Detroit Treasurer Office
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11120
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
