US District Court for the Western District of Michigan Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 221 - 230 of 3,633
Lewis #616302 v. Schiebner
as 1:2022cv00206
Petitioner:
Eddie Ryan Lewis #616302
Respondent:
James Schiebner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Campbell #228510 v. Schiebner
as 1:2022cv00216
Petitioner:
Shawn Campbell #228510
Respondent:
James Schiebner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miles #216730 v. Schiebner
as 1:2022cv00217
Petitioner:
Billy Jack Miles #216730
Respondent:
James Schiebner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roper #327369 v. Schiebner
as 1:2022cv00214
Petitioner:
Anthony Roper #327369
Respondent:
James Schiebner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bane #282910 et al v. Schiebner
as 1:2022cv00210
Petitioner:
James Edward Bane #282910
Respondent:
James Schiebner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hammond Jr. #193821 v. Schiebner
as 1:2022cv00215
Petitioner:
Tracy Cecil Hammond #193821, Jr.
Respondent:
James Schiebner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ambrose #185357 v. Schiebner
as 1:2022cv00208
Petitioner:
Joseph Ambrose #185357
Respondent:
James Schiebner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
North #289996 v. Schiebner
as 1:2022cv00212
Petitioner:
Christopher North #289996
Respondent:
James Schiebner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cherry #322891 et al v. Schiebner
as 1:2022cv00209
Petitioner:
David Cherry #322891
Respondent:
James Schiebner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore #224339 v. Schiebner
as 1:2022cv00213
Petitioner:
David Moore #224339
Respondent:
James Schiebner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
