US District Court for the Western District of Michigan Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 3,630
Mason #742866 v. Bauman
as 1:2024cv00147
Petitioner:
Dominic Michael Mason and Dominic Michael Mason #742866
Respondent:
Warden Cathrine S. Bauman and Cathrine S. Bauman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson #505022 v. Christiansen
as 1:2024cv00118
Petitioner:
Anthony B. Anderson #505022
Respondent:
John Christiansen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. LaJoye-Young
as 1:2024cv00116
Petitioner:
Mark Allen Hill
Defendant:
Michelle LaJoye-Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams #483474 v. Morrison
as 1:2024cv00096
Petitioner:
Spencer Williams #483474
Respondent:
Bryan Morrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gillespie v. Taylor
as 1:2024cv00078
Petitioner:
Ryan Ledean Gillespie
Respondent:
Trent Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Sharp v. Wrigglesworth
as 1:2024cv00056
Petitioner:
Delmar Sharray Sharp
Respondent:
Scott Wrigglesworth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Patterson #195160 v. Morrison
as 1:2024cv00013
Petitioner:
Michael E. Patterson #195160
Respondent:
Bryan Morrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. LaJoye-Young
as 1:2024cv00003
Petitioner:
William Williams
Respondent:
Michelle LaJoye-Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Uturo #521797 v. Bauman
as 2:2023cv00257
Petitioner:
Joseph Uturo #521797
Respondent:
Catherine S. Bauman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Townsend #257689 v. Morrison
as 1:2023cv01371
Petitioner:
Jason Lanelle Townsend #257689
Respondent:
Bryan Morrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
