US District Court for the District of Minnesota Torts - Property Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 3,233
Roehrs v. Walstrom et al
as 0:2023cv01885
Plaintiff:
Steven Roehrs
Defendant:
Sandra Walstrom, Ervin Abraham, Janet Tharp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Blackwell v. Kraemer North America, LLC
as 0:2023cv01851
Plaintiff:
Robert Blackwell
Defendant:
Kraemer North America, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity: Forcible Detainer
Yennie v. United States of America
as 0:2023cv01702
Plaintiff:
Sheila Ann Yennie
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
Valdez et al v. Target Corporation
as 0:2023cv01681
Plaintiff:
Fatima Valdez, Harold Robertson II and Harold Robertson, II
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Brown v. Fairhaven Financial Advisory Corporation
as 0:2023cv01493
Plaintiff:
Shawn Brown
Defendant:
Fairhaven Financial Advisory Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Brown v. Tomford et al
as 0:2023cv01466
Plaintiff:
Shawn Brown
Defendant:
Travis Tomford, Jay H Lucas and NuWay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Brown v. Lucas et al
as 0:2023cv01464
Plaintiff:
Shawn Brown
Defendant:
Jay H Lucas, North Shore Forensic Psychology, Dr. Travis Tomford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Coleman v. US Post Office
as 0:2023cv01431
Plaintiff:
Robert Coleman
Defendant:
US Post Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Brown v. Atkinson et al
as 0:2023cv01465
Plaintiff:
Shawn Brown
Defendant:
Samantha R Atkinson, Brittney Swenson and Cassie Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Mendoza v. Renewal by Andersen LLC
as 0:2023cv01427
Plaintiff:
Manuel Mendoza
Defendant:
Renewal by Andersen LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
