US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 5,453
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Moore v. Fitch
as 3:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Surf Moore
Defendant:
Lynn Fitch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Adams v. Bailey et al
as 3:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Bobbie Adams
Defendant:
Sheriff Bryan Bailey, K-9 Officer Tony Shack, Investigator Christian Dedmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Leggett v. Wayne County et al
as 2:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Cooper Leggett
Defendant:
Wayne County, Wayne County Board of Supervisors, Hal Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Martin v. City of Poplarville, MS
as 1:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Bert Martin
Defendant:
City of Poplarville, MS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Lacey v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
Reginald Lacey
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Necaise v. Bay St. Louis-Waveland School District
as 1:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Amy Necaise
Defendant:
Bay St. Louis-Waveland School District
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
