US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina Real Property Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 167
Stueben v. Meade et al
as 5:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Stueben
Defendant:
Desmond Meade, Contrina Vaughn, Steve Cowart and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Treece v. Truitt et al
as 5:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
Warren Britt Treece
Defendant:
Catherine Truitt, Andrew Houlihan, Terry Vaughn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Treece v. Hucks
as 5:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Warren Britt Treece
Defendant:
Erin Hucks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Treece v. Kinsley et al
as 5:2024cv00215
Plaintiff:
Warren Britt Treece
Defendant:
Kody Kinsley and Vaughn S. Monroe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ford v. Perry
as 7:2024cv00327
Plaintiff:
Oliver W. Ford
Defendant:
Leon Levert Perry II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mabiala v. Omega Auto Outlet et al
as 5:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
Thomas Mabiala
Defendant:
Omega Auto Outlet and Exeter Finances LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Tri-State Insurance Company of Minnesota v. Commercial Solutions Specialists, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Tri-State Insurance Insurance Company of Minnesota
Defendant:
Commercial Solutions Specialists, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Washington v. Marshall et al
as 4:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Constance Washington
Defendant:
John P. Marshall, Marvin K. Blount, III, Wendy Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sekoh v. Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing
as 5:2023cv00523
Plaintiff:
Linda S. Sekoh
Defendant:
Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sultana v. BOK Financial
as 5:2023cv00494
Plaintiff:
Nargis Sultana
Defendant:
BOK Financial
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
