US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Cases 1 - 10 of 37,548
Daytoon, Inc. v. Tazmanian Freight Forwarding, Inc. et al
as 7:2024cv00371
Plaintiff:
Daytoon, Inc.
Defendant:
Tazmanian Freight Forwarding, Inc. and Landstar Express America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81 Damaged Goods While Being Transported
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Cromartie v. Reams et al
as 5:2024ct03098
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Cromartie, Jr.
Defendant:
Ashston Reams, Susan Addams, Marcus Houis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Pate et al
as 5:2024ct03099
Plaintiff:
Daniel Isaiah Thomas
Defendant:
Lt. Pate, Robeson County, Burnis Wilkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webb v. USA
as 5:2024cv00237
Petitioner:
Lemont Jerrone Webb
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 5:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 5:2024cv00242
Petitioner:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 5:2024cv00238
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Criterion Supply Solutions, LLC v. Kenny's Candy & Confections, Inc.
as 7:2024cv00370
Plaintiff:
Criterion Supply Solutions, LLC
Defendant:
Kenny's Candy & Confections, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Contract Dispute
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 7:2024cv00374
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
