US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina Contract Cases
Cases 21 - 29 of 29
AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS v. DISCCA ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC., et al
as 1:2010cv00481
Defendant:
DISCCA ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. and ROBERTSHAW CONTROLS COMPANY
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BACHMAN v. TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION et al
as 1:2010cv00263
Plaintiff:
ANGELA BACHMAN
Defendant:
TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION and TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A., INC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
MEY CORPORATION v. ZHEJIANG LINGHUA INDUSTRY COMPANY LIMITED et al
as 1:2010cv00253
Plaintiff:
MEY CORPORATION
Defendant:
ZHEJIANG LINGHUA INDUSTRY COMPANY LIMITED, ZHEJIANG CHEMICALS GROUP CO., LTD. and ZHEJIANG LINGHUA GROUP IMPORT & EXPORT CO., LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LEGACY PADDLESPORTS, L.L.C. v. A. SCHULMAN, INC.
as 1:2010cv00240
Plaintiff:
LEGACY PADDLESPORTS, L.L.C.
Defendant:
A. SCHULMAN, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
BUTCHER v. DAIMLERCHRYSLER COMPANY, LLC et al
as 1:2008cv00207
Plaintiff:
MARK BUTCHER
Defendant:
DAIMLERCHRYSLER COMPANY, LLC and CHRYSLER LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
WHITE v. COUNTRY COACH, INC. et al
as 1:2007cv00852
Defendant:
COUNTRY COACH, INC., COUNTRY COACH LLC and CATERPILLAR, INC.
Plaintiff:
THEODORE E. WHITE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
SARLI v. MYLAN BERTEK PHARMACEUTICAL, INC. et al
as 1:2007cv00043
Plaintiff:
TAIMAZ SARLI and TAIMAZ SARLI
Defendant:
MYLAN BERTEK PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., MYLAN BERTEK PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., MYLAN BERTEK PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
INTERFACE FABRICS, INC. v. TRENT ENTERPRISES, INC. et al
as 1:2006cv00825
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ICARO, S.A. v. PIEDMONT AVIATION CO
as 1:2004cv00139
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
