US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina Labor Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 106
ERNESTO v. WINSTEAD
as 1:2014cv00699
Defendant:
LEWIS DANIEL WINSTEAD
Plaintiff:
DAVID DIAZ ERNESTO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1801
QUINT v. TRIDENT MANAGEMENT, INC.
as 1:2014cv00287
Plaintiff:
JESSICA QUINT
Defendant:
TRIDENT MANAGEMENT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DIXON HUGHES GOODMAN LLP v. KURT SALMON US, INC.
as 1:2014cv00146
Plaintiff:
DIXON HUGHES GOODMAN LLP
Defendant:
KURT SALMON US, INC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
KIM v. DONAHOE
as 1:2013cv00838
Plaintiff:
KAREN M. KIM
Defendant:
PATRICK R. DONAHOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
CLEMMONS v. NVT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 1:2013cv00777
Plaintiff:
HARVEY LEE CLEMMONS, JR.
Defendant:
NVT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
PATTERSON v. HONDA POWER EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURING, INC., et al
as 1:2013cv00061
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN PATTERSON
Defendant:
HONDA POWER EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURING, INC. and KIBBLE DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
BROWNELL et al v. CITY OF GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2012cv01311
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BROWNELL , TRAYVEAWN GOODWIN , CHRISTIAN HICKS and others
Defendant:
CITY OF GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
MORGAN et al v. CITY OF GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2012cv01110
Plaintiff:
DAVID MORGAN and ROGERS REYNOLDS
Defendant:
CITY OF GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HURTADO v. GMK APARTMENTS, INC.
as 1:2012cv00862
Plaintiff:
LUGARDO HURTADO
Defendant:
GMK APARTMENTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GASSAWAY v. DURHAM TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE
as 1:2012cv00542
Plaintiff:
DANIEL G. GASSAWAY
Defendant:
DURHAM TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
