US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 801
Noco Company, Inc. v. Guanqzhou Unique Electronics Co., Ltd., et al
as 1:2020cv01169
Plaintiff:
Noco Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Sui Cheng Limited and Guangzhou Unique Electronics Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Noco Company, Inc. v. Shenzhen Gooloo E-Commerce Co.
as 1:2020cv01171
Defendant:
Shenzhen Gooloo E-Commerce Co., Ltd.
Plaintiff:
Noco Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Noco Company, Inc. v. Aukey Technology Co., Ltd.
as 1:2020cv01174
Plaintiff:
Noco Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Aukey Technology Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Noco Company, Inc. v. Zhejiang Quingyou Electronic Commerce Co., Ltd.
as 1:2020cv01170
Plaintiff:
Noco Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Zhejiang Quingyou Electronic Commerce Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Noco Company, Inc. v. Nice Team Enterprise Limited
as 1:2020cv01173
Defendant:
Nice Team Enterprise Limited
Plaintiff:
Noco Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Tunnel IP LLC v. Best Buy Co., Inc.
as 5:2020cv01162
Plaintiff:
Tunnel IP LLC
Defendant:
Best Buy Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Samuel Stamping Technologies, LLC v. Therma-Tru Corp.
as 3:2020cv01011
Plaintiff:
Samuel Stamping Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
Therma-Tru Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Symbology Innovations, LLC v. Under Armour, Inc.
as 5:2020cv00890
Defendant:
Under Armour, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Symbology Innovations, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Stormborn Technologies LLC v. Lockheed Martin Corporation
as 5:2020cv00891
Defendant:
Lockheed Martin Corporation
Plaintiff:
Stormborn Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Symbology Innovations, LLC v. L'Occitane, Inc.
as 1:2020cv00889
Defendant:
L'Occitane, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Symbology Innovations, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
