US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 798
Symbology Innovations, LLC v. Swagelok Company
as 1:2020cv01824
Defendant:
Swagelok Company
Plaintiff:
Symbology Innovations, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Symbology Innovations, LLC v. Chick-fil-A, Inc.
as 5:2020cv01795
Defendant:
Chick-fil-A, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Symbology Innovations, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Coretek Licensing LLC v. Avaya, Inc.
as 5:2020cv01666
Defendant:
Avaya, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Coretek Licensing LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Jewel Pathway LLC v. Adidas America, Inc.
as 5:2020cv01640
Plaintiff:
Jewel Pathway LLC
Defendant:
Adidas America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Landmark Technology A, LLC v. Art of Beauty Company, Inc.
as 1:2020cv01637
Plaintiff:
Landmark Technology A, LLC
Defendant:
Art of Beauty Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Symbology Innovations, LLC v. Furukawa Rock Drill USA, Inc.
as 5:2020cv01499
Defendant:
Furukawa Rock Drill USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Symbology Innovations, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Noco Company, Inc. v. Shenzhen Yike Electronics Co., Ltd.
as 1:2020cv01166
Plaintiff:
Noco Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Shenzhen Yike Electronics Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Noco Company, Inc. v. Guanqzhou Unique Electronics Co., Ltd., et al
as 1:2020cv01169
Plaintiff:
Noco Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Sui Cheng Limited and Guangzhou Unique Electronics Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Noco Company, Inc. v. Shenzhen Gooloo E-Commerce Co.
as 1:2020cv01171
Defendant:
Shenzhen Gooloo E-Commerce Co., Ltd.
Plaintiff:
Noco Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Noco Company, Inc. v. Aukey Technology Co., Ltd.
as 1:2020cv01174
Plaintiff:
Noco Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Aukey Technology Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
