US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 17,433
Goff et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01979
Plaintiff:
Richard Goff and Amber Goff
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wright v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01980
Plaintiff:
Julius Wright
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Buttram v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01982
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Buttram
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lloyd v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01977
Plaintiff:
Lacey Lloyd
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Milam v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01985
Plaintiff:
William Milam
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Morton v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01986
Plaintiff:
Mia Morton
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01988
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Johnson
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hall v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01960
Plaintiff:
Jonathan B Hall
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Figuera Galindo et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01971
Plaintiff:
Antonio Figuera Galindo and Christine Figuera Galindo
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mazza v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01963
Plaintiff:
Michael Mazza
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
