US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 17,707
Wilson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02301
Plaintiff:
Anita Wilson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gibson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02273
Plaintiff:
Charles Gibson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Goins v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02276
Plaintiff:
Milton Goins, Jr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hyatt v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02278
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Lee Hyatt
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Owens v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02290
Plaintiff:
Jeffarie Owens
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Feliz v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02315
Plaintiff:
Abiu Feliz
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Fonsworth v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02316
Plaintiff:
Bennett M. Fonsworth
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Peters v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02323
Plaintiff:
Laurie Joy Peters
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Huffman v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02277
Plaintiff:
Franklin Huffman
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thompson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02297
Plaintiff:
Stephen Thompson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
