US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 31,019
Tysinger et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02355
Plaintiff:
Lawrence K. Tysinger and Michele Tysinger
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bloomer v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02319
Plaintiff:
Retha Bloomer
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bouras v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02314
Plaintiff:
Timothy Bouras
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Peters v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02323
Plaintiff:
Laurie Joy Peters
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Huffman v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02277
Plaintiff:
Franklin Huffman
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thompson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02297
Plaintiff:
Stephen Thompson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McCoy v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02287
Plaintiff:
Darcy McCoy
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rose v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02293
Plaintiff:
Martin Rose
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Russo v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02280
Plaintiff:
Louis Russo
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Giragos v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02321
Plaintiff:
John G. Giragos, Jr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
