Southern District of Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 2,618
Nelson v. Warden, Warren Correctional Institution
as 2:2017cv00730
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Malone v. Warden, Noble Correctional Institution
as 1:2017cv00548
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Connally v. Warden, Noble Correctional Institution
as 2:2017cv00729
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miller v. Warden, London Correctional Institution
as 1:2017cv00536
Petitioner: Ian Miller
Respondent: Warden, London Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Kirby v. Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
as 2:2017cv00711
Petitioner: Anthony Kirby
Respondent: Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Saxton v. Bracy
as 2:2017cv00703
Petitioner: Kelvin D. Saxton , Jr.
Respondent: Charmaine Bracy
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thornton v. Warden, Noble Correctional Institution
as 2:2017cv00702
Plaintiff: Eric Thornton
Defendant: Warden, Noble Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Churchill v. Warden, Southeastern Correctional Complex
as 2:2017cv00690
Petitioner: Joseph Churchill
Respondent: Warden, Southeastern Correctional Complex
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCall v. Warden, Ross Correctional Institution
as 2:2017cv00691
Petitioner: Mikell McCall
Respondent: Warden, Ross Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burks v. Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
as 2:2017cv00687
Petitioner: Jeffrey M. Burks
Defendant: Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?