Southern District of Prisoner Petitions Cases
General Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,590
Rahab v. Warden Noble Correctional Institution
as 1:2017cv00412
Petitioner:
Malik Rahab
Respondent:
Warden Noble Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wali v. Warden Warren Correctional Institution
as 1:2017cv00410
Petitioner:
Douglas Al-Azeem Wali
Respondent:
Warden Warren Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Warden, Madison Correctional Institution
as 1:2017cv00396
Petitioner:
Winston Thomas
Respondent:
Warden, Madison Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Galluzzo v. State of Ohio, et al. et al
as 2:2017cv00499
Petitioner:
Michael A Galluzzo
Respondent:
State of Ohio, et al., Clark County Sheriff, et al.
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nguyen v. Warden North Central Correctional Institution
as 2:2017cv00490
Petitioner:
Charles H Nguyen
Respondent:
Warden North Central Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Khaleghi v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 1:2017cv00377
Petitioner:
Seyed Arash Khaleghi
Respondent:
U.S. Attorney General, DHS/ICE
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McGee v. Warden, Madison Correctional Institution
as 1:2017cv00378
Petitioner:
Mark McGee
Respondent:
Warden, Madison Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanders v. Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
as 2:2017cv00472
Petitioner:
Marvin Sanders
Respondent:
Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nguyen v. Warden North Central Correctional Institution
as 2:2017cv00467
Plaintiff:
Charles H Nguyen
Defendant:
Warden North Central Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
