Southern District of Forfeiture / Penalty Cases

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 416
United States of America v. Seven Thousand One Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($7,100.00) in United States Currency et al
as 2:2018cv00556
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Seven Thousand One Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($7,100.00) in United States Currency, Five Thousand Twenty and 00/100 Dollars ($5,020.00) in United States Currency
Cause Of Action: Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. $24,000.00 (Twenty-four Thousand Dollars) in United States Currency
as 1:2018cv00359
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $24,000.00 (Twenty-four Thousand Dollars) in United States Currency
Claimant: Brian L Goolsby
Cause Of Action: Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. $132,183.44 from PNC Bank, N.A. Money Market Account No. XXXX2353 et al
as 2:2018cv00281
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $132,183.44 from PNC Bank, N.A. Money Market Account No. XXXX2353, $1,019,076.76 from PNC Bank, N.A. Money Market Account No. XXXX9249, $40,000.00 from PNC Bank, N.A. Money Market Account No. XXXX9206 and others
Cause Of Action: Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. A Glock GMBH, Model 27 Gen4, .40 Caliber Pistol, SN: BCYK326, with a Glock GMBH .40 Caliber Magazine et al
as 3:2018cv00044
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: A Glock GMBH, Model 27 Gen4, .40 Caliber Pistol, SN: BCYK326, with a Glock GMBH .40 Caliber Magazine, A Ceska Zbrojovka, Model Scorpion Evo 3 SI, 9mm Pistol, SN: C058127, with a Ceska Zbrojovka 9mm Magazine
Cause Of Action: Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. $17,893.00 (Seventeen Thousand Eight Hundred Ninety-Three Dollars) in United States Currency et al
as 1:2018cv00088
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $17,893.00 (Seventeen Thousand Eight Hundred Ninety-Three Dollars) in United States Currency, $12,900.00 (Twelve Thousand Nine Hundred Dollars) in United States Currency, 1970 Cadillac Fleetwood, VIN P0200185 and others
Cause Of Action: Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. Twenty-One Thousand One Hundred Dollars ($21,100.00)
as 3:2018cv00024
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Twenty-One Thousand One Hundred Dollars ($21,100.00)
Cause Of Action: Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. An Israel Military Industries (IMI), Model Desert Eagle, .40 caliber semi-automatic pistol, bearing serial number 31312988
as 2:2018cv00036
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: An Israel Military Industries (IMI), Model Desert Eagle, .40 caliber semi-automatic pistol, bearing serial number 31312988
Cause Of Action: Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. Hi-Point, model C9, 9mm pistol, bearing serial number P1431734
as 1:2017cv00832
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Hi-Point, model C9, 9mm pistol, bearing serial number P1431734
Cause Of Action: Administrative Procedure Act
United States of America v. Nine Thousand Five Hundred Eighty Dollars US Currency ($9,580.00) et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00401
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Nine Thousand Five Hundred Eighty Dollars US Currency ($9,580.00), Five Hundred Twenty-Five Dollars US Currency ($525), Sun City Machinery, Model Stevens 320, 12 Gauge Shotgun, SN: 130884E and others
Claimant: Jay P Bakhshi
Cause Of Action: Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. A Smith & Wesson, M&P 9C, 9mm Pistol, Serial Number HRX7722, Loaded with Eleven (11) Rounds of Ammunition et al
as 2:2017cv00797
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: A Smith & Wesson, M&P 9C, 9mm Pistol, Serial Number HRX7722, Loaded with Eleven (11) Rounds of Ammunition, One Hundred Three (103) Rounds of Assorted 9mm Ammunition, Seventy-Four Thousand Five Hundred Sixty-Four and 00/100 Dollars ($74,564.00) in United States Currency
Cause Of Action: Forfeiture Property-Drugs

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?