US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Cases 51 - 60 of 80,745
Carson v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02317
Plaintiff:
Philip Carson
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brogley et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02320
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Brogley and Christina Brogley
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hiltz-Scerbo v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02322
Plaintiff:
Leiza A. Hiltz-Scerbo
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jackson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02302
Plaintiff:
William Jackson
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ash v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02310
Plaintiff:
Clyde E. Ash, Jr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02309
Plaintiff:
Robert Jones
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Behnke v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02304
Plaintiff:
Richard Behnke
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kyse v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02327
Plaintiff:
William V Kyse
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hooker v. Capri Gardens
as 2:2024cv02306
Plaintiff:
Ray Hooker
Defendant:
Capri Gardens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Crown Equipment Corporation v. Naumann/Hobbs Material Handling Corporation II, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
Crown Equipment Corporation
Defendant:
Naumann/Hobbs Material Handling Corporation II, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
