US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Civil Rights Cases

Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,850
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00227
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Anderson v. Harrison
as 2:2024cv01951
Plaintiff: Wilfred L. Anderson
Defendant: Brenda Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
v. Ohm et al
as 2:2024cv01954
Plaintiff: Stan Ohm
Defendant: Randy H Dupree, Christopher J. Regan and Brett McRoberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01943
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Vance v. Frisco
as 3:2024cv00119
Plaintiff: Marvin D Vance
Defendant: Kimberly Frisco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Singleton v. AAA Club Alliance
as 1:2024cv00219
Plaintiff: Gerald Singleton
Defendant: AAA Club Alliance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00222
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Miami Valley Fair Housing Center, Inc. v. Canterbury Court Limited Partnership et al
as 3:2024cv00118
Plaintiff: Miami Valley Fair Housing Center, Inc.
Defendant: Canterbury Court Limited Partnership and Episcopal Retirement Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Chapman v. Yost We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv01865
Plaintiff: Tasha Chapman
Defendant: Ohio Attorney Genera Dave Yost
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00210
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?