US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Civil Rights Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 10,850
Burgess v. Grace et al
as 1:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
Kren/Karen Y Burgess
Defendant:
Mr. Grace, Ms. Murry, Mr. August and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01523
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01524
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024oe01523
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Seid v. O'Grady
as 2:2024cv01480
Plaintiff:
Indrias Seid
Defendant:
Commissioner John O'Grady
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01467
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01461
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act
Lange et al v. City of Piqua et al
as 1:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Alisha Lange, David Smith, Greg Neves and others
Defendant:
City of Piqua and Paul Oberdorfer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Synan v. Kobasuk et al
as 1:2024cv00169
Plaintiff:
Thomas Synan, Jr.
Defendant:
Mark Kobasuk and Village of Newtown, Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Lange et al v. City of Piqua et al
as 3:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Alisha Lange, David Smith, Greg Neves and others
Defendant:
City of Piqua and Paul Oberdorfer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
