US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma Civil Rights Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 1,681
Cox v. McCarthy
as 5:2023cv00502
Plaintiff:
Yasin Cox
Defendant:
Randall K McCarthy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Doe v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2023cv00495
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
L Rothschild Express Trust v. Washington State of
as 5:2023cv00465
Respondent:
Washington State of
Claimant:
L Rothschild Express Trust and Dominick Wernicke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sam v. BancFirst et al
as 5:2023cv00452
Plaintiff:
Ellijah Sam
Defendant:
BancFirst and Brian W Pierson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Royal v. Jones et al
as 5:2023cv00431
Plaintiff:
Tony Royal
Defendant:
Eric Jones and U-Stor Self Storage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Strover v. Mears Group Inc
as 5:2023cv00427
Plaintiff:
Paul Strover
Defendant:
Mears Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Stricklin v. Edmond City of Oklahoma
as 5:2023cv00418
Defendant:
Edmond City of Oklahoma and The Edmond Police Department
Plaintiff:
Keely Stricklin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Agrawal et al v. Oklahoma City City of et al
as 5:2023cv00410
Plaintiff:
Kris K Agrawal, Nationwide Engineering and Testing and Vance-I Properties LLC
Defendant:
Oklahoma City City of and KFOR Television
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Antwine v. Oklahoma City Police Department et al
as 5:2023cv00359
Plaintiff:
Shirley Antwine
Defendant:
Oklahoma City Police Department, Oklahoma City City of, Robert A Burton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Test Case Plf v. test et al
as 5:2023cv08001
Plaintiff:
Test Case Plf
Defendant:
test and Test Case Dft2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
